GREAT - I will give those a look... but so far the Eagle and 590 product
review graphs look awfully close to each other, and appear to put both
radios in the same category.
I examined the graphs Kim so kindly mentioned and they look so close I
would put both rigs in the same category. I have asked the ARRL lab
team to comment on them, although I do not expect a reply.
I put them together in a single image:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/minirichards/14771061673/
These graphs from the ARRL product reviews do not appear show the 590
produces substantially more broad band noise as claimed.
MORE EVIDENCE -- I found this table of transmitter and receiver noise
values, taken from ARRL product reviews, and the 590 scores better
than most on this list. From the ARRL graphs, above, I expect the
Eagle to be in the same league as these top scoring rigs, but
unfortunately the table does not mention the Eagle. .
See the Table here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/minirichards/14750477854/
This chart and the ARRL graphs Kim mention seem to give BOTH rigs a
clean bill of health... at least better than most, and both better than
some far more expensive radios.
----------------- JHR --------------------
On 7/26/2014 6:21 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
Product reviews that can be downloaded from the ARRL website.
> To compare the radios, you've got to pick values off each graph and
plot
them on the same graph.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|