Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

TopBand: RE: Poor 160M Condx

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: TopBand: RE: Poor 160M Condx
From: jkjones@fn.net (Jon K. Jones)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 20:01:35 -0600
I believe another factor in the recent "poor
160M condx" is sporadic E. Intense
E-layer ionization may completely absorb 
160M signals, much like auroral ionization
which also occurs in this region. These Es
clouds have a much higher critical frequency
than the 0.4-0.6 MHz Bob, NM7M notes for
the E region in general. Es tend to appear
more frequently during the sunspot minumum
with a minor seasonal peak from Nov. to Jan.
There has been many widespread Es openings
on 6  meters recently. 
73 and Season's Greetings,
Jon N0JK




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions:              topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & KM9P

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TopBand: RE: Poor 160M Condx, Jon K. Jones <=