| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | TopBand: UNI-HAT vs. GAP vs. GLADIATOR |
| From: | jjensen@mankato.msus.edu (Joel Jensen) |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Oct 1997 14:41:41 -0500 |
>My mobile antenna beat a GAP in a FS comparison. Almost any antenna >will beat a GAP. I assume you're referring to the GAP on 160. (This is the TOP BAND reflector after all...) I have to agree... However, the GAP is a strong performer on 40. Of course, it's a 1/2 wave vertical dipole on 40. 73 de W0JDJ - --- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TopBand: Alternatives to the inverted L, Stan Seiffert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TopBand: 80 and 160 in postage size lot, Michael McLaughlin |
| Previous by Thread: | TopBand: Alternatives to the inverted L, Stan Seiffert |
| Next by Thread: | TopBand: UNI-HAT vs. GAP vs. GLADIATOR, Lane C. Zeitler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |