Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

TopBand: Re: EWE dialogue

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: TopBand: Re: EWE dialogue
From: gregsmith@futuredbn.co.za (Greg, ZS5K)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:04:09 +0200
> I have found it is better at rear attenuation rather than a tight
>front beamwidth.

I agree with all Bill's comments on the EWE, including the above.

 I find that the width of the front lobe can be reduced significantly when
using two EWE's phased, spaced about 40m apart.  This clearly needs more
real estate than a single loop, but nothing like what is required for a Bev,
and can be fitted on to my city lot.

Earl's (K6SE) pennant antenna is even smaller, and has about the same
performance.

73, Greg, ZS5K



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions:              topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-topband@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>