k6se@juno.com wrote:
> My theory about this is that the steel wire, having greater loss, did a
> better job of providing more attenuation of signals arriving from the
> opposite direction because they had to propagate down to the far end of
> the wire and then be reflected back down the wire to the receiver end.
Isn't it a wonderful and rather "different" concept that you're better of using
poor-quality wire for this antenna because it performs better as a result!
Hi-Fi buffs with your figure-of-eight oxygen-free copper wire at $20 a metre -
eat your hearts out!
Keith
--
Keith Jillings
G3OIT GW3OIT G-UTSY at EGMC
|