| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: broadbanding an L |
| From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:13:02 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
One important point! Broad bandwidth is not an always indication of poor efficiency, even though it sometimes is. It is very possible and actually quite common to have low efficiency antennas with narrow bandwidth, and high efficiency antennas with wide bandwidth. This can be true even when antenna are similar in size. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: ARRL Contest Log Deadline, Ken Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: N2XE Beacon Tribune - January 1, 2005, John C Ceccherelli |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: ARRL Contest Log Deadline, Ken Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: broadbanding an L, dennis o'connor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |