| To: | jmaass@columbus.rr.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Re: S-meter | 
| From: | Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net> | 
| Date: | Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:55:11 -0400 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
| 
 Jeff Maass wrote: S-meters have little meaning when using receiving Jeff, Here in the tropics the S meter always lets me know where I live by seldon dropping below S9 plus on 160. I use my S meter as a test indicator to measure f/b rejection of Beverages on BC station tests.Noise floor determination on Beverages is also a good use. For example yesterday I did something that I should have done long ago. My SW Beverage has been terminated in a chain link fence railing and support post which runs around my 1/2 acre plot for several hundred feet. By removing the ground connection and running the SW Beverage over the top of the fence by a few feet and down to a series of 4 foot ground rods inside the fence about 15 feet away caused my noise floor on the SW Beverage to drop about 1 and a half S units on 160. The signal levels from reference BC stations in Columbia and Venezuela did not drop at all. I repeated the test several times to make sure I was getting a correct result. In the morning I worked a bunch of solid JA contacts on this antenna.I would imagine that part of this success was due to a skew path to the southwest. Yet my S meter let me know I was making some improvement in the ability for this Beverage to receive. 73 Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ 
  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Conditions Last Night, Herb Schoenbohm | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: The Beacon Tribune - Weekend Edition, John C Ceccherelli | 
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Topband: Re: S-meter, Jeff Maass | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Re: S-meter, Ian Keyser | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |