Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ?

To: "john devoldere, ON4UN" <john.devoldere@telenet.be>,Topband <Topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: FW: ERROR IN ARRL 160M CONTEST RULES ?
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:15:09 -1000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Any comments?

Yes, I do have a comment about QST reporting of the scores. QST has reduced 
their coverage of the 160 meter contest scores to show only the top ten in each 
catagory and then in their "Regional Scores" section only the top five in each 
catagory for each REGION. Since the exchange in the 160 test is RST and 
SECTION, one might expect that score listings would show how we fared relative 
to others in our SECTION, rather than REGION. Max KH6ZM and I don't even have 
our scores printed in QST, even though we came in first and second in our 
SECTION. To get our scores printed we would have to be in the top five of the 
whole West Coast REGION, not just the Southwest DIVISION or the Pacific 
SECTION. We are 2500 miles, or more, away from all the other sections in the 
Southwest Division.

If you're an ARRL member you can download the PDF version of the QST coverage. 
What you get in the download includes what was in print in QST as well as the 
rest of the scores (the last six pages) that QST just cannot find space for 
these days.

I enjoyed OPERATING in the contest in 2004 and this year too. Submitting a log 
is not the most enjoyable part of the process, and if my score isn't going to 
be printed why put in the effort?

DE N6KB






_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>