Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Error in ARRL 160 contest rules?

To: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net>,<topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Error in ARRL 160 contest rules?
From: "Connie Marshall" <k5cm@azalea.net>
Reply-to: k5cm@azalea.net
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:26:46 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
W2RU wrote
Aha!!!

The ARRL 160 contest is not -- and never was -- intended to be a DX 
contest.  It's a domestic contest.  In fact, in its first running in 
1970 and for some number of contests thereafter,  _all_ DX contacts 
counted as a _single_ multiplier.  Thus, the maximum multiplier in 1970 
was 76:  74 ARRL Sections, VE8, and "DX".   The fact that the Board 
and/or the ARRL Communications Department positioned the date of the 
contest right after a major CW DX contest weekend further attests to the 
fact that they did not originally intend it to be of particular interest 
to DXers, per se.
***********

Bud.... well said and I agree!

K5CM
Connie

--
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>