Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Shunt Feed Question/Observation

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Shunt Feed Question/Observation
From: "lahlumradio@juno.com" <lahlumradio@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:14:08 GMT
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
WA3TTS posted a question/observation about the measured swr/impedance of a 
MFJ1793 ant as used on 160m.
His question/observation concerned the measurement of swr( impedance) at the 
end of a 1/2 w coax line and its change with temperature. The MFJ 1793 antenna 
in his application made use of a L shunt feed or L type network to transform 
the impedance at the antenna.




My suggestion if you want to want to understand your losses and how they vary 
with temperature and other parameters, is to make the measurement of the real 
part of the impedance at the ant terminals before any shunt elements (L shunt). 
 
If you measure where you did in front of the shunt L, any changes in the ant 
reactance(like a change in center freq), causes the real part of the input 
impedance in front of the shunt L to change( and the change may be magnified, 
that is a small percent change in C causes a larger percent change in the input 
real part impedance, to a point where you have no idea what is really happening.
    R at input to L network (at res)  =  Rant + 1/ (w^2 Cant^2 Rant )
 
Another interesting thing is that if you model the MFJ 1793 on 160m it is looks 
like  a "2.2 ohm" ant. That is with ideal current return the real part of the 
impedance is 2.2 ohms. Nothing wrong with that, except you need to very careful 
about the losses. There are a number of sources of losses which degrade its 
performance, the coil loss of the 45 uh base inductor ( for example a Q of 300 
is equivalent to 1.7 ohms itself ), and then the top loading inductor also adds 
more loss, as does the fact that you most likely do not really have a ideal 
current return.
I would speculate that the majority of the effective current return is not via 
the 80m/40m/20m elevated radials, but I would guess is coming via a path from 
ground. You can easily see that by measuring the real part of the ant impedance 
with the radials flowing, and then connect the ground paths and remeasure the 
real part of the impedance. My experience with similar situations using 
elevated radials of 1/8 w, is that the real part of the impedance changes, and 
actually goes up, which means the gain or the field strength goes down. In 
order to avoid this effect, the return current flowing via ground must be 
blocked.
FS = 10 Log (k I^2)  =  10 Log ( k Pin/ R)               (per W7EL, ARRL ANT 
Handbook)
 
73s
Rob W1MK


________________________________________________________________________
Interested in getting caught up on today's news?
Click here to checkout USA TODAY Headlines.



________________________________________________________________________
Interested in getting caught up on today's news?
Click here to checkout USA TODAY Headlines.
http://track.juno.com/s/lc?s=198954&u=http://www.usatoday.com/news/front.htm?csp=24
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>