| To: | "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>,"Petr Ourednik" <indians@xsmail.com>, <Topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Omni VII performance on 160m |
| From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:53:28 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
|
I agree with Mike on this. IP3 for a number of reasons is useless for determining anything useful. Ignore it. I'd look only at the IMD dynamic range. The Omni 7 doesn't look too bad. While it is not exceptionally good, it most certainly isn't bad. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Omni VII performance on 160m, Michael Tope |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Omni VII performance on 160m, Robert McGwier |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Omni VII performance on 160m, Michael Tope |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Omni VII performance on 160m, Robert McGwier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |