Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Ground Radials and an inv-L antenna

To: "Dennis Peterson" <dennisissure@comporium.net>, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Ground Radials and an inv-L antenna
From: w8av <w8av@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:24:30 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Dennis:

You have not reached a point of diminishing returns here.  Although you see no 
virtual change in the antenna VSWR, the radiation efficiency of the antenna 
system improves every time you add additional radials under the antenna.  There 
is published data in the Proceedings of the IRE that show that once you reach 
120 radials you see no additional improvements to the efficiency of the antenna 
by adding more radials.  With regard to length, the magic cut-off number for no 
improvement to radiation efficiency is 0.4 wavelengths.  That is why when I 
worked in the broadcast industry, we always installed 120 radials of at least a 
quarter wavelength long under all AM broadcast towers.

You have reached a point where the transmitter is happy with the antenna match 
but you can improve the antenna's signal radiating efficiency by adding still 
more radials under the antenna.  You are trying to reduce the ground losses in 
the near field of the antenna with the ground system and when you finally reach 
120 1/4 wavelength radials, the antenna will be about as good as it can be.  
You should also not see any VSWR change by adding the additional radials.

If you can't get to a 1/4 wavelength in all directions, you can add more 
radials in the shortened areas to help improve the radiation efficiency in 
those directions where the ground system is shortened.  If you can't get 120 
radials down, put as many down as you physically can and make them as long as 
you can.

73.................de Goose, W8AV
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>