Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Open wire line vs. Paralleled coaxials.

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Open wire line vs. Paralleled coaxials.
From: "David J. Sourdis" <hk1kxa@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:53:44 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>

I have a friend's farm near the coast line to use for contesting/DX. There is a 
group of palm trees, very tall, one of them is 25+ m. Interesting posibilities 
for a vertical array for top band, but it has a small drawback: it is 80m+ away 
from the TXCVR. 

I have used openwire line for my dipoles and other antennas also the window 
line 450 ohm and more with RG59 or RG6 in parallel using center conductors as 
open wire line. Shields tied together and grounded at matcher's chassis. 
Longest run ever used: abt 40m of RG6 paralleled. It can be installed as coax 
without the problems of the ladder line and antennas can be used on other bands.

Literature says that paralleled coax is not as good as "real" open wire line. 
Is there any other information or technical data available? Here, RG6 of good 
quality is cheaper than good RG213, even when doubled. For a long run of almost 
100 meter to get comfortably to the tree group, I wonder if losses would be too 
much.

David  
HK1KXA
EC5KXA


                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Keep your friends updated—even when you’re not signed in.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/social-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_5:092010
_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>