No need to dig up existing stuff to keep from affecting the FCP. Deal
with existing radials according to your needs and common sense. They might
help some, though there certainly is no proof of that. If you can't see
'em and aren't tripping on them, why bother to mess with them. 73, Guy.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:05 PM, W0UCE <w0uce@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> Steve:
>
> As long as you keep the middle 20 feet (10' on either side of the center
> feed point) in a straight line for cancellation purposes, you can put the
> remainder in the shape of a V or bend as necessary.
>
> 73,
> Jack
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: topband-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:
> topband-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Steven Raas
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 10:59 PM
> To: Guy Olinger K2AV
> Cc: Mike Waters; topband
> Subject: Re: Topband: K2AV 160m Folded Counterpoise Antenna - New
> DetailsPosted
>
> Im currently one of those ' Limited Space 160 Ops' .. @ moment im using an
> 'Inv L' to use the term loosley. ( Diagram Attached )
>
> I am really thinking about trying one of these FCP's.. altho it would take
> some considerable work removing whats already in place.. but no big deal.
>
> My question is this.. the actuall FCP Element(s) can they be aranged so
> that from the Feed Point they would look like an extreemley wide 'V' and
> not straight? ( Instead of 180 deg to one another .. say mabey 130 deg)
> Also.. would near buy house(s) hinder their tuning / Operation @ published
> lengths?
>
> If I was to install one here.. to keep my current feed point position where
> it is ( best for vertical rise in my case ) .. the Feed would be @ corner
> of house.. with 33' of the FCP in the back yard in the clear @ 8-10' up..
> and the other 1/2 (33' ) of the FCP running alongside my house.. @ 8-10'
> up.
>
> -Steve Raas
> N2JDQ
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV
> <olinger@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > Just a word on ferrite beads, and other kinds of baluns. Trust us, if it
> > could be done wrong, we blew it, if it could burn, we burned it, if it
> > could be cracked, we shattered it, if it couldn't stand up to 1.5 kw, we
> > smoked it. We tried every possible short cut and cheep trick imaginable.
> > Anything except winding a special transformer that we couldn't buy
> > ready-made off a shelf somewhere. We got where we got because ultimately
> > only a rugged isolation transformer would get it done.
> >
> > We are NOT opposed to your verifying our experience in that regard, by
> > starting with beads and working your way up. Get in a supply of
> > tranquilizers before you start. Only do one better than we did, take
> > pictures/video of the carnage for the entertainment of the masses.
> >
> > The specific construction of the transformer stands up to brick-on-key
> 1.5
> > kw and runs cold. There is a reason for the low mu powdered iron
> choice.
> >
> > 73, Guy.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:21 PM, W0UCE <w0uce@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > * The ONLY means of achieving the required degree of Isolation
> is
> > > to
> > > > use the Isolation Transformer as specified by K2AV
> > > >
> > >
> > > I was thinking of sliding a whole bunch of ferrite beads over the coax
> > > feedline right at the end. But I'll take your word for it.
> > >
> > > This is all very interesting. I'd sure like to try Guy's invention
> > myself.
> > >
> > > 73, Mike
> > > www.w0btu.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|