[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: EIRP Measurement

To: Tree <>
Subject: Topband: EIRP Measurement
From: Tod - ID <>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 19:04:20 -0700
List-post: <">>
In thinking about the measurement of EIRP for the new band it occurred to me 
that this might be the time for a few folks to think about how we could 
fabricate a "commonly calibrated" field strength meter. Such a device might 
well be used on both 160m and the 600 kHz band. By commonly calibrated in mean 
a device that has an agreed upon standard way to calibrate it that can be done 
with simple methods. One thing that always intrigued me about the HeathKit 
products was the fact that they used very simple methods to allow the builder 
to adjust the device without expensive equipment. Sometimes that meant a 
special circuit built into the product which was only used for adjusting the 

The important thing is to have a way to assure that when someone measured the 
same field at the same point with the same type of measurement device they 
would get the same measurement result. That would allow us to compare 
measurements between different people even if we did not know the absolute 
field strength value.

An interesting idea might be to make such a field strength meter have an 
interface to Wi-Fi so that it could be positioned at a remote point and send 
its readings to one's local network. There are a lot of ways to do that of 
course, but planning to have it part the device initially would simplify taking 
measurements. I am sure that there are others who could contribute ideas that 
eventually could be used to formulate design objectives for such a device. If 
there was enough interest I can imagine that a single PCB could created and a 
lot of such devices built to allow us to add to our collection of measurement 
devices that help us fabricate better antennas and stations. 

I wonder if I am the only one who thinks this might be a useful TopBand subject.

Tod, K0TO

UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>