| To: | Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Lab style comparison results on 160m small lot antenna changes. |
| From: | DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:21:02 -0700 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Guy,
why must we continually test NEC against measurements? The work by N6LF has
shown great correlation between simulation and the real world.
Those of us who design electronic circuits (including EM) in the world of
computer simulation have great faith in the various programs and NEC-4 (and
possibly NEC-2) should give us an adequate A-B comparison.
Dave WX7G
_______________________________________________
Stew Perry Topband Distance Challenge coming on December 29th.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Exceptional opening to ZL-land, Ilmo Anttila |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Lab style comparison results on 160m small lot antenna changes., Shoppa, Tim |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Lab style comparison results on 160m small lot antenna changes., Guy Olinger K2AV |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Lab style comparison results on 160m small lot antenna changes., Shoppa, Tim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |