Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions

To: "'Topband'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions
From: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 22:30:47 -0000
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
And more Horizontal polarisation and less vertical,  i.e. No free lunch. 73
Clive GM3POI

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Don
Johnson
Sent: 11 August 2013 21:49
To: Topband
Subject: Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions

I have not seen a length mentioned for the inverted L, so thought I would
note that by making the inverted L longer than a quarter wave moves the high
current portion up the vertical. I had good luck with an inverted L about
3/8 wave long. By good luck I mean DXCC plus some on 160. I still am trying
to improve. In any event feeding the inverted L with a series capacitor made
tuning a breeze. By going longer than a quarter wave made the feed point
inductive and raised the R value closer to 50. 
73,
Don
N4DJ

Sent from my iPhone
_________________
Topband Reflector

_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>