Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Fwd: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Fwd: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??
From: Henry Pollock - K4TMC <kilo4tmc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:26:14 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
L.B. Cebik, W4RNL (www.cebik.com) devoted a number of his antenna articles
on the Extended Double Zepp antenna variations and their application.

73,
Henry Pollock - K4TMC



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jim GM <jim.gmforum@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter
versions??
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>


All so see http://rudys.typepad.com/ant/files/antenna_colinear_zepp.pdf


On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Jim GM <jim.gmforum@gmail.com> wrote:

> See http://www.chem.hawaii.edu/uham/zepp15.html
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Jim GM <jim.gmforum@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> W8Ji is right with his analogy about the extended dipole.
>>
>> We used a 40M extended dipole for a few years on Field Day.  Our closest
>> guess was we had about 1 to 2 db over a 1/2 dipole on 40m in USA. Maybe
we
>> had a lousy ground the the extended dipole over came that as W8JI had
said.
>>
>> I believe the lobes on 40 and other bands for this antenna was to our
>> advantage for East West propagation. One of our team members looked into
it
>> more.
>>
>> --
>> Jim K9TF
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jim K9TF
>



--
Jim K9TF
_________________
Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>