Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: WLW

To: rgarrett5@comcast.net, topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: WLW
From: Mark Connelly <markwa1ion@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:35:03 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
The Saudi Arabia 1521 recordings were made from the car at local MA beach sites 
with a Drake R8A receiver and a loop antenna on the car roof.


The "magic bullets" for good reception are:
(a) Select a site with salt water and a clear horizon view towards what you 
want to hear.  Poor ground (rocks, sand, hills/mountains, tall 
buildings/vegetation) towards side and rear interference directions can help 
too.
(b) Stay away from power lines.
(c) Do most listening to the east at sunset before interference from the west 
builds up.
(d) Look at the weather maps to make sure any lightning is a long way off.


Propagation certainly factors in too.  There are times when the US East Coast 
path to Europe / Middle East is dead but you get a good run at South America 
and perhaps deep Africa.  The same phenomenon is also noted on Topband of 
course.


Nowadays I am using a Perseus SDR receiver on these seaside listening sessions,
<http://microtelecom.it/perseus/>.


The ability to store spectrum for later playback is the obvious killer-app with 
that.


The latest car roof receiving antenna implementation is shown here:
<http://www.qsl.net/wa1ion/loop/car_roof_loop.htm>


For 160m, I would advise a larger size antenna than the 2m by 2m square one I 
use on the car.  You're dealing with smaller signals: sub-100 watt up to 1.5 kW 
stations instead of multi-kilowatt up to megawatt-plus ones you'd find on the 
AM broadcast band.


The advantages on 160: higher (more "shortwave-like") frequency, less 
interference (except during contests / pile-ups), and the great signal-to-noise 
advantage of CW versus AM or even SSB.


Some of my broadcast band recordings may be accessed from 
<http://www.qsl.net/wa1ion/dx_audio.htm> for anyone who's interested.  A number 
of DXers of that frequency range are very interested in design and homebrew of 
antenna and receiver accessories; some have done complete receiver 
designs-and-builds.


Many of these listener-DXers are also hams and find much in common technically 
with what's developed for 160m, 600m, and other LF/MF bands.  ON4UN's books and 
W8JI's website are well known.


As the selection of New England / Atlantic Canada reports below shows, many 
broadcasters make it across the Atlantic to US and Canadian listeners, at least 
when good locations (coastal typically), antennas, and receivers are put to use 
by those who know what they're doing.
<http://www.bamlog.com/peidxped.htm>
<http://www.naswa.net/badx/dxclams2009.htm>
<http://realmonitor.com/Quoddy_Head_DXpedition.pdf>
<http://www.dxing.info/equipment/new_active_mw_antennas.pdf>
<http://www.dxing.info/dxpeditions/newfoundland_09log.dx>


Many more reports can be found via links from 
<http://www.dxing.info/dxpeditions/> and <http://www.bamlog.com/#Section5>.


The idea here is that, even if you have little interest in broadcast-band DX as 
a standalone hobby, checking that frequency range does offer propagational 
clues that can help coordinating 160-m operation, antenna design, location 
evaluation, and so on.


Mark Connelly, WA1ION
South Yarmouth, Cape Cod, MA, USA


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Garrett <rgarrett5@comcast.net>
To: Mark Connelly <markwa1ion@aol.com>
Sent: Tue, Sep 17, 2013 3:18 pm
Subject: Re: Topband: WLW


Great stuff Mark. Don't let the naysayers get you down. Recordings were very 
interesting

Robert  B. Garrett, President/C.E.O.  
North Central Sight Services, Inc.
2121 Reach Road
Williamsport, PA 17701
P: 570-323-9401 Ext.126

Sent from my iPhone 

...
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Mark Connelly
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:15 AM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Topband: WLW
> 
> 1.7 megawatts out of WLW was no doubt the highest power run by anyone in the 
> Western Hemisphere on medium wave.
> 
> 
> Duba, Saudi Arabia runs 2 megawatts on 1521 kHz all the time.  No wonder 
> that it often screams in here on the coast of Massachusetts around local 
> sunset, as in this recording:
> <http://www.qsl.net/wa1ion/audio1/dx_saudi_arabia-1521_20060503_2300z.mp3>
> or this one:
> <http://www.qsl.net/wa1ion/audio1/dx_1521_saudi_arabia_20081029_2300z.mp3>
> 
> 
> 1521 has proven to be a useful propagation indicator to the Middle East, as 
> is the UAE station (R. Farda) on 1575 with 800 kW and Kuwait (R. Sawa) 1548 
> (600 kW).
> 
> 
> The signals are at least 15 dB stronger at seashore sites than at locations 
> even just 5 to 10 miles inland, especially if the intervening land is sandy 
> or rocky.  A receiving antenna that is substantially elevated would cut 
> those losses some at the inland site.
> 
> 
> Mark Connelly, WA1ION
> South Yarmouth, MA
> 
> 
> <<
>> He told us it was put in for Crosley who got a bug in his butt to  see what
>> the rig would really do. The meter showed the total current on the  three
>> finals. One night he cranked it up as far as it would go. Keep in mind, 
>> the
>> voltage on the finals was 17,500 volts, as I remember. He got that meter up
>> to 100 amps. Do the math. He burnt up some local fences that  night.
>> 
>> Of course, 13 transmitters (with plug-in coils) each  running 220,000 watts
>> simultaneously on several bands down the road at  VOA was astonishing, but
>> that 1,700,000 watts at WLW was stuck in our minds  all the way home that
>> night.  We were TopBand guys,  afterall!
>> 
>> 73, Best DX, Barry, W9UCW
> _________________
> Topband Reflector 
> 
> 


 
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>