Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving

To: k3lr@k3lr.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving
From: Brian_ve7jkz <ve7jkz@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:09:04 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Tnx Tim, interesting reading.

Brian VE7JKZ

On 9/18/2013 9:02 AM, Tim Duffy wrote:
You might find some ideas from a presentation during the 2011 Top Band
Dinner at Dayton helpful. There are some details about how a low dipole
performs on 160.

"Inexpensive Receive Antennas for Top Band"

http://topbanddinner.com/page_presentations.html


The low dipole at K3LR (20 feet high) is one of my favorite (performs well)
RX antennas.

73,
Tim K3LR


-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Brian_ve7jkz
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 10:34 AM
To: BY THE LAKE; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Low dipole for receiving


Good suggestion Bill. Yes, I could get a loop around the place, probably
close to a half wave on 160 as well. Tnx for the suggestion.

Brian VE7JKZ

On 9/18/2013 4:40 AM, BY THE LAKE wrote:
Do you have room to make a loop?  It does not have to run straight or
flat, and it does not need to be a full half wave to work well on
160M.  Put up the longest enclosed length you can and then worry about
the matching later. Building a matching circuit is straightforward and
effective.....use your analyzer and prune for lowest SWR.

I put one up to supplement my Beverages and K9AY and it sure helps on
high-angle DX.  I also use it in diversity mode with my K3, operating
against one of the verticals and the system really works well.

Mine is, at places, only 8 ft above ground; in other places is is 20+ ft.

Bill, VE3NH


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3392 / Virus Database: 3222/6677 - Release Date: 09/18/13


_________________
Topband Reflector



_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>