Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??

To: "'Mike Waters'" <mikewate@gmail.com>, "'topband'" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??
From: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:11:15 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Quite a bit of the radiation from 5/8 wave verticals is at relatively high
elevation angles - above 40 degrees elevation.

(Perhaps useful for VHF mobiles that need to hit mountain top or hill-top
repeaters)

Charlie, K4OTV


-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Waters
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:53 AM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than
shorterversions??

A lot of hams on 160m have been similarly "shocked". :-)

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Niko Cimbur <ac6dd@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> We were shocked to find that the existing 1/4 wl performed better than the
> much taller [5/8 wave] Vertical.
>
_________________
Topband Reflector

_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>