| To: | "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: Question - optimum number of radials |
| From: | DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net> |
| Reply-to: | DALE LONG <dale.long@prodigy.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:12:42 -0800 (PST) |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I understand that 120 radials is the golden standard. At what point is there no significant improvement? How much worse is 60 radials? How much worse is 24 radials (4 of 1/4 lambda and 20 or 1/10 lambda)? This may have been discussed in the past, but if there is any engineering reference or field testing that has been done, I would like to know the results. Thanks Dale - N3BNA _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Power stayed on!, ZR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials, Mike Waters |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Ice, Mike Waters |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials, Mike Waters |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |