| To: | <k8bhz@hughes.net>, <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Fw: Shortened Radial Experiments |
| From: | "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:30:43 +0100 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
That might mean a lot at only 4 ohms radiation resistance 73 Peter -----Original Message----- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of k8bhz@hughes.net >From the antenna measurements, you can see that doubling the amount of copper (& labor!) resulted in only 2 ohms improvement from 16 to 32 radials. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Confusion in ON4UN's Low Band DXing radial length calculations., Bill Wichers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Fw: Confusion in ON4UN's Low Band DXing radial lengthcalculations., k8bhz |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Fw: Shortened Radial Experiments, k8bhz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Fw: Shortened Radial Experiments, Eddy Swynar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |