Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webin

To: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Subject: Topband: Comments on High Performance RX Antennas for a Small Lot (Webinar)
From: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 01:57:26 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Rick,

I would also think that peak radiation angle of the RX antenna versus the
arrival angle of the desired signal is also a big variable that would not
allow the relationship you heard on the webinar to be true under all
conditions.  As you said it probably is too much of a generalized
statement, and needs some very specific conditions to be true.

I know with my RX antennas the improvement in signal to noise compared with
my TX vertical is very dependent on arrival angle (as an example).

P.S I did not hear the webinar.

73,
Don (wd8dsb)

On Friday, March 4, 2016, Richard (Rick) Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','richard@karlquist.com');>> wrote:

> In this webinar, it was asserted (without explanation) that
> for every 1 dB increase in RDF, you get 1.5 to 2.0 dB
> improvement in S/N ratio.  I've never heard that before
> and don't even see how it makes sense.  Actually, I don't
> even know how you can make generalizations like that
> unless you are describing a theoretical QTH with uniform
> isotropic noise.  I'd like to believe this is true.
> Can someone educate me as to why I should believe this?
>
> Rick N6RK
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>