Hi Mark,
The sloping radials you're proposing to use also have the affect
of shortening the effective length of your vertical, just as if
you had raised the feed point.
73
Frank
W3LPL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark K3MSB" <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
To: "topBand List" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:33:54 AM
Subject: Topband: 160M Inverted-L Radial Question
I've been doing some reading on elevated radials for Inverted-L antennas.
The existing literature seems to fall into two types; ground radials where
the feed point is very close the ground, and systems were the feed point
is elevated at the height of the radials.
My Inverted-L is 50 feet high and has the feed point in a box at ground
level. I'm considering using 2 elevated radials so as to reduce the
radial field next to my new (hopefully) RX antenna (BOG). Since I
don't want to raise my feed point by 5 feet and thereby decrease the
vertical part of the Inverted L accordingly, I was considering using a
pair of elevated radials (5 feet high -- don't know the exact height
yet). I was planning on the radials sloping up 45 degrees from the base
of the Inverted-L to my radial height. The radials will not be straight,
but will have doglegs due to property constraints.
I haven't found any literature that addresses this consideration.
Comments?
73 Mark K3MSB
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|