Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] New T2X

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [TowerTalk] New T2X
From: [email protected] ([email protected])
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 13:51:41 -0600
--Boundary-1041848-0-0

Steve - K7LXC said: 
>That's because these towers [Rohn HDBX/HBX series] were designed to be 
>used as TV antenna supports and not HF yagis.  The stamped legs and 
>non-connecting X-braces >provide little compressive or torque resistance.   
 
Are there any towers designed to de used as HF yagi support structures? 
 
73, 
de ed -- K-zero-IL 
[email protected] 



--Boundary-1041848-0-0
X-Orcl-Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: 30 Mar 1997 09:56:44                    Sent: 30 Mar 1997 09:52:03
From:"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected],[email protected]
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] New T2X
Reply-to: [email protected]
X-Orcl-Application: Sender:  [email protected]
X-Orcl-Application: Precedence:  bulk
X-Orcl-Application: X-Sponsor:  W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C


In a message dated 97-03-30 06:32:14 EST, [email protected] (H John Kohl) writes:

> The interesting comment from the Rohn spec sheet "DWG. N). A-760001R1"
>  for the BX towers.
>  
>  Note:  Antenna types should be limited to those having a maximum boom
>  length of 10 feet.  No engineering data relating to the use of boom
>  lengths in excess of 10 feet is available and the use of such boom
>  lengths is not recommended.    
>  
     That's because these towers were designed to be used as TV antenna
supports and not HF yagis.  The stamped legs and non-connecting X-braces
provide little compressive or torque resistance.  

73,   Steve   K7LXC

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              [email protected]
Administrative requests:  [email protected]
Problems:                 [email protected]


--Boundary-1041848-0-0--

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              [email protected]
Administrative requests:  [email protected]
Problems:                 [email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>