| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] BX "safe" load |
| From: | [email protected] (Stan Griffiths) |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 1998 00:47:11 -0800 (PST) |
My personal opinion based on observing two failures where the tower folded about two thirds of the way up from the base is that a TH6DXX is too big for it . . . This is one way to zero in on the data we need in spite of Rohn's unwillingness to cooperate . . . Stan [email protected] -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: [email protected] Administrative requests: [email protected] Problems: [email protected] Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] BX & 10 foot boom, Stan Griffiths |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Rohn 20G/25G again, Stan Griffiths |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Re: Balun Tech Lit, Charles W. Shaw |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] BX "safe" load, Charles H. Harpole |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |