Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] pier point vs section in concrete

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] pier point vs section in concrete
From: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:04:47 EST
In a message dated 98-03-20 13:43:41 EST, brunet@us.ibm.com writes:

<< What are the pros and cons of using a pier point bottom instead of burying
a 5'
 tower section in concrete?  >>

     A pier pin bottom for ham applications IMO is more hassle than it's
worth. You have to temporarily guy the first section so that you can stack the
other sections thus doing everything twice. What a waste of time. 

    A pier pin on a big tower with big loads is a good idea. It equalizes the
leg compression forces to one place. We're talking tall towers with big
headloads, microwave dishes, etc. (A 10 foot microwave dish has almost 50
sq.ft. of wind loading).

     Typical ham towers and ham loads are subject to much smaller forces. I
much prefer a section set in concrete. Then it's strong enough to stack up to
the first set of guys. And no putzing around with temporaries.

73,  Steve  K7LXC

     TOWER TECH -- professional tower supplies and services for amateurs

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>