| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Penetrox vs WD40/graphite |
| From: | harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole) |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Apr 1998 18:29:51 -0400 (EDT) |
I have used the Pentrox kinda of stuff--sold by Mosley -- on all my antennas since 1965, All of these alumn. beams have worked as specified and upon disassembly, came apart with no extra effort. Can't imagine what Tennadine has in his mind. de K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] Towers and Airports., Fred Hopengarten |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Soldering on tower, Charles H. Harpole |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Penetrox vs WD40/graphite, dessel.rick@Orbital.COM |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Penetrox vs WD40/graphite, K7LXC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |