Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

R: [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 mod for 10 meters

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: R: [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 mod for 10 meters
From: Maurizio Panicara" <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 00:01:02 +0200
What I told is that in my model, not in an actual C3, the extra 10m
reflector doesn't produce any substantial benefit on 10m while produces some
other questionable effects.

73,
Mauri I4JMY

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Natan Huffman <force12e@lightlink.com>
A: Maurizio Panicara <i4jmy@iol.it>
Cc: Tom Schiller <force12@tcsn.net>; towertalk@contesting.com
<towertalk@contesting.com>
Data: sabato 8 maggio 1999 21.51
Oggetto: Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 mod for 10 meters


Mauri,

You are incorrect in your conclusions.  The additional reflector produces
more gain and an increase in front to back across the band.

Natan W6XR/2
FORCE12 East
----- Original Message -----
From: Maurizio Panicara <i4jmy@iol.it>
To: <n4vi@diac.com>; <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 1999 7:08 AM
Subject: R: [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 mod for 10 meters


>
> I don't know if the thread was already discussed, but time ago I tried an
> extensive computer modeling of an open sleeve tribander, very similar to
the
> F12 C3.
> It came out that a dedicated reflector for 10m doesn't  produce any
> improvement in gain and pattern but only increase wind load and weight,
> narrows bandwith and negatively affects warc bands.
>
> If I were Chris I would drop.
>
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: n4vi@diac.com <n4vi@diac.com>
> A: towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Data: venerdì 7 maggio 1999 17.30
> Oggetto: [TowerTalk] Force 12 C3 mod for 10 meters
>
>
> >
> >I wasn't imaginative enough in my search of the towertalk
> >archives so I will have to bring this subject up again.
> >
> >A few months or so ago there was some discussion on modifying a
> >Force 12 C3 to make it 3 elements on 10 meters.  Can anyone
> >provide me with additional information on this modification?
> >
> >Since this info has already been on Towertalk before, please
> >reply directly to me.
> >
> >thanks!
> >
> >chris,
> >n4vi
> >
> >
> >--
> >FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> >Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> >Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> >Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com

> >Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>