Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] properly feeding a tribander stack

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] properly feeding a tribander stack
From: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 08:11:10 -0600
Pete, generally the reason why some people use odd number of quarter
waves in feed line length is to reduce unwanted current from flowing on
the outside of an unbalanced transmission line (coax) when feeding a
balance antenna (yagi, dipole). If the non antenna end of the feed line
has it's coax shield grounded, then the impedance of the line looking
from the antenna back down the outside of the line will be high. This
discourages current from flowing on the outside of the coax.

A good balun will achieve the same result and can also work on more than
one band. I can't see any advantage to using quarter wave line if a good
balun is used. 


Dave
K0QE

        ----------
        From:  Pete Smith [SMTP:n4zr@contesting.com]
        Sent:  Saturday, October 16, 1999 8:18 PM
        To:  towertalk@contesting.com
        Subject:  [TowerTalk] properly feeding a tribander stack


        I have been operating all along on the premise that in feeding a
stack it
        is sufficient to have equal feedline lengths from a common
feedpoint such
        as a stackmatch, in order to feed the driven elements in phase.
Now a
        local has said that the feedlines should not only be equal in
length but
        also an odd number of quarter waves in length.  I vaguely recall
a
        discussion of stacking several years ago on Towertalk in which
one of the
        established experts said that it was necessary to do this to
force equal
        currents in the driven elements, for the best possible pattern.

        Obviously, having to switch feedlines in order to meet this
criterion would
        significantly complicate a typical tribander stack.  Does anyone
know:

        1.  Is this true, even in the abstract?

        2.  If it is, quantitatively, how significant is it?

        73, Pete Smith N4ZR
        n4zr@contesting.com 

        Sometimes a tower is just a tower

        --
        FAQ on WWW:
http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
        Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
        Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
        Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
        Search:
http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>