Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] 80M dipoles/height gain
From: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb)
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:24:04 +0000
Here are some EZNEC calcs of an 80 meter dipole at heights from 60' to
160'

Clearly guys who get even dipoles high win.

height  max gain/angle  half power angles       20deg gain
60'     6.52dbi/89deg   30deg                   1.5dbi
80'     6.16dbi/52deg   23deg                   2.16dbi
100'    6.38dbi/40deg   19,81deg                3.4dbi
120'    7.05dbi/33deg   16,56deg                5.0dbi
140'    7.84dbi/28deg   14,45                   6.8dbi
160'    8.31dbi/25deg   12,39                   8.3dbi

The 20 degree angle point was chosen because it represents a point
that the a point in the second peak of the eu arrival angle
distribution with a large fraction of the total . (East coast,
Washington DC) It says going from 80' to 160' one gains about an S
unit in EU from the East coast.

The 6-12 degree region contains the first arrival angle distribution
peak. It takes a dipole at 160' to put much energy there.  A vertical
isn't the answer to cover these lower angles -- unless you have
excellent ground conductivity.  EZNEC shows that verticals are also
poor performers at these angles there in areas of conductivities in
the 2-5 range (my QTH is 2.5.)  Of course, if your vertical antenna is
on a salt marsh, you win.

73 de Brian/K3KO
n4kg@juno.com wrote:
> 
> I would not expect much benefit from a 2L80 at only 85 ft
> which is barely over 1/4 WL high.  The ground reflection at
> 1/4 WL high is centered straight up.  The free space pattern
> of the Yagi is centered at the horizon.  The vector product
> will peak somewhere in between.  You may want to model
> a 2L80 and an 80M dipole at 140 ft and 85 ft and see how
> much net gain you will realize from that configuration before
> proceeding.  You might be surprised to see little benefit
> over a dipole at 85 ft.
> 
> 40M antennas play VERY WELL from 70 to 100 ft so that
> is a good choice.
> 
> Tom  N4KG
> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> 
> K7PUC wrote:
> 
> I am planning on installing subject beam at 85' using the Orion 2800
> rotator--both already on hand.
> These 80m yagi posting have me wondering what problems I may be facing.
> My
> plan is to install
> one set of elements on the boom at ground level (crankup tower), raise
> the
> tower to vertical and
> then rotate the boom 180 degrees.  Lower the tower and install the
> opposite
> end elements.
> 
> Never having had a tower higher than 35', I will appreciate all comments.
> 
> BTW, I was mostly interested in a 40m beam but decided to add 80m!
> 
> k7puc
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
> 
> List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this summer? Call us
> for information on our fabulous Trylon Titan self-supporting towers - up to
> 96-feet for less than $2000! at 888-833-3104 <A 
> HREF="http://www.ChampionRadio.com";>
> www.ChampionRadio.com</A>
> 
> -----
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
> Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com

List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this summer? Call us
for information on our fabulous Trylon Titan self-supporting towers - up to
96-feet for less than $2000! at 888-833-3104 <A 
HREF="http://www.ChampionRadio.com";>
www.ChampionRadio.com</A>

-----
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>