Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: Re: [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Fw: Re: [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD
From: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 19:03:03 -0600
Here is W1JR's answer to the capacity hat question
on the 40-2CD, forwarded with his permission.

Tom  N4KG

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joe Reisert <jreisert@jlc.net>
To: n4kg@juno.com, n4zr@contesting.com
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:55:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD

Hi Tom,

The capacity hats on the 40-2CD do help to shorten the element lengths 
slightly. However, I believe their greatest value is improvement in the 
overall bandwidth.

I also think if they were out a few inches further than they presently
are, 
that the improvement would be even greater. Just a gut feeling. 
Furthermore, increasing the spacing between the ends of each coil and the

tubing would probably increase efficiency (lower coil loss). However, all

things are tradeoffs!

73,

Joe, W1JR

At 06:32 AM 4/14/2002 -0600, n4kg@juno.com wrote:
>Probably to reduce the amount of inductance needed
>and possibly greater efficiency.  That's my GUESS.
>
>Maybe W1JR will give you an answer. I believe HE
>designed the antenna when he was at CC.
>
>Tom  N4KG
>


________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>