Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Re: STACKING

To: "Martin Ewing" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Re: STACKING
From: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 00:16:24 -0400
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
Turning 90 degrees does not always work out, because sometimes booms
can behave as dipoles with end loading and can weird the patterns just
as much running the antennas in-line.

73, Guy.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martin Ewing" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 10:39 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: STACKING


> Seems to me you should be able to nearly eliminate the interaction
by
> setting your 15 m beam azimuth 90 degrees offset from your 40 m
beam.
> (Assuming the booms aren't resonant!)  Complicates your pointing
just a
> little, of course, and it would look funny.  I wonder if anyone has
> tried that.
>
> An even stranger configuration would be to set up your 15 m beam
with
> vertical polarization.  You could share the boom.
>
> It's getting late here...
>
> -Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers",
"Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free,
1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>