----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Sundberg" <sm2cew@telia.com>
To: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials/elevated radials
> Thanks Jim!
>
> Your response tells me that even though radials are spread out under the
> vertical they need not be connected to have influence on the pattern. But
> surely there must be a substantial difference in performance between
having
> radials connected to the feeder or floating??
Sure, there's a difference. The real problem is that it's very difficult to
determine what the difference is. And, whether it is "substantial". They
did a bunch of tests back in the 80's with models and field tests to try and
look at things like "If you have a deteriorated set of ground radials,
what's the best/easiest/etc. fix? Should you connect the elevated radials
to the ground radials? Is a ground stake a good idea in combination with
elevated radials (addressing the lightning protection issue)?"
When I read all the reports I get the feeling that there wasn't a good
answer. Sometimes the model matched, sometimes it didn't, mostly because
there were too many unknowns. Even in the field tests, sometimes it was
better with it connected, sometimes not.
>
> 73/Peter SM2CEW
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|