Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Beads & Sleeves

To: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RFI Beads & Sleeves
From: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Reply-to: k2xx@swva.net
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:07:04 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Tom, do you want the impedance to be largely resistive so that it's not so frequency dependent and the ferrite is effective over a wider frequency range?

Just curious, because I just bought a bag of inexpensive ferrites on Ebay, and they didn't start showing a resistive component until about 7 MHz. Name brand ferrites specified for amateur applications (e.g., Fair-Rite) show a resistive component at 2 MHz and below and have a higher reactive component until about 11.5 MHz, where the cheap ones become more reactive. However, their resistive component was still substantially below the Fair-Rite.

I posted the data on the TenTec forum, but the tabulation was verkecht. If you're interested, I can send it to you privately.

73, Joe

Tom Rauch wrote:

I am going to order some used components from Surplus


Sales of Nebraska. I


thought I might order some beads to use to help me with


some RFI problems I


am experiencing. For example, the A/D for in computer


assisted rotator


controller has some RFI problems on the higher HF bands.



Bypassing and grounding is generally much more effective than throwing a bead at a problem.



Can someone recommend which type of beads I should have


handy to assist with


RFI problems as they arise.



You generally want the highest possible **resistance** and a core that allows multiple turns. Impedance goes up nearly by the SQUARE of the turns increase. Two turns through one bead is generally about twice the impedance of one turn through two of the same beads.


Look carefully at the impedance vs frequency, and IGNORE the "frequency range" in descriptions. Pick the highest impedance in the operating frequency range where you have the problem. Once again, bypassing with capacitors is often much more effective than slapping a bead on the problem (unless the equipment already has good bypasses). A bead is useless when the common mode impedance is significantly higher than the bead impedance.



Here is the URL to the web page with the information on


the beads and


sleeves that Surplus Sales of Nebraska sells.
http://www.surplussales.com/FerBeaSle/FerBeaSle-1.html



Why not go to a regular suppression core vendor? At least be sure you look at the real data for the cores. You generally want hundreds or more ohms of impedance, and you want that impedance to be largely resistive. That precludes using 43 and similar materials in suppression applications. You want something with a well-defined broad peak at HF for HF suppression, not a material who's impedance keeps climbing with frequency well up into VHF.

73 Tom

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk



_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>