Steve, N2IC wrote, in comment to Dave, N6LL's comments:
<snip>
> Once you do the conversions, the claimed
> gain is as follows:
> Band 4el Steppir C31XR
> 20 9.5dBi 8.1
> 17 10.0 -
> 15 10.2 8.4
> 12 10.4 -
> 10 10.6 9.5
Those Steppir gain figures are very questionable. They are significantly
higher
than the gain figures for optimized yagi designs in the 20th edition of the
ARRL
Antenna Book. While a Steppir may be a fine antenna, it's still just 4
elements
on each band, and won't be any better than an optimized 4 element beam on
the
same boom length.
<snip>
Steve is right on point...there is no magic. I can't speak to the 4 el
steppIR,
but the Mertel's published measured field data for the 3el. I would expect
they
would test the 4 el in the same fashion, but can't attest to that. Simply
asking
them might clear things up.
IMHO the steppIR 3 or 4 el is not materially better or worse than a 3 or 4
el monobander
on the same boom length. What it IS, is flexible.
n2ea
jimjarvis@ieee.org
ps: steve...tnx for the geo888 fix!
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|