Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ??

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] How flexible is standard LMR-400 ??
From: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <nv8a@att.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:25:16 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I don't *think* regular LMR400 is flexible enough for the 
rotator-to-tower loop.

But I would be inclined to use Davis RF's Bury-Flex in place of 
LMR400UF: it's cheaper even than regular LMR400 and has marginally lower 
loss than LMR400UF. In fact I might use it for the whole rig-to-antenna 
run (at least for HF), even though the loss is marginally greater than 
for regular LMR400.

See http://www.davisrf.com

HTH

73

Alan NV8A


On 09/16/05 11:58 am Al Williams tossed the following ingredients into 
the ever-growing pot of cybersoup:

> Can standard LMR400 be used for the rotator to tower loop which has repeated 
> bending or should flexible LMR400 be used?
> 
> k7puc 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
> Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
> questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>