Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks - and follow up Q's.

To: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks - and follow up Q's.
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:05:39 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

At 04:25 AM 6/23/2006, Mark Beckwith wrote:

>Grossly paraphrased, the literature has always said (on 160M) "as little as
>30 or 35 feet vertical is enough.  The horizontal part doesn't radiate but
>acts as loading to make the antenna resonant" right?

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

The horizontal part also helps make it more broadband in terms of 
SWR. A 30 or 35 foot vertical, whether center or base loaded is going 
to be very narrow. A motor driven loading coil at the base would be a 
good idea. The impedance will also be very low and a good matching 
network is needed.

Bill, W6WRT

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>