Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] cable capacitance

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] cable capacitance
From: Jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:13:37 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:56:13 -0400
From: Jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] twisted pair capacitance

DUH...I'm completely wrong.  What is reduced is crosstalk
between pairs.  Brain cramp. Sri.  EA


Tom's right.  What you were thinking of is telco cable, 
where the pairs are twisted for a distance, then twisted 
in the REVERSE direction for an equal distance.  the result
is that at audio frequencies, the net capacitance is reduced.
n2ea


Message: 8
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:46:44 -0400
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR cable capacitance (was: SteppIR
        problem)
To: <wc1m@msn.com>, "'W5LT'" <W5LT@tx.rr.com>,
        <towertalk@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <013e01c7ac58$e1f926d0$640fa8c0@radioroom>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original

> with a heavy braided shield around the entire bundle. If 
> I'm not mistaken, a
> twisted pair reduces the amount of capacitance between the 
> wires in the
> pair.


Twisting always increases capacitance between pairs. Haven't 
you ever used a gimmick capacitor??  :-)



Jim Jarvis, President
The Morse Group, LLC
We create high-performance organizations.
732 548 5573 office
443 618 5560 cell
jimjarvis@themorsegroup.net
www.themorsegroup.net 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TowerTalk] cable capacitance, Jim Jarvis <=