Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's

To: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>,"hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>,"'Scott W3TX'" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>,"'Krishna Kanakasapapathi'" <kkanakas@cisco.com>,"'Alan NV8A'" <nv8a@att.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:24:31 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Other radio services often have the station/studio and antenna
in separate locations, for good reasons.  EG, broadcasters,
land mobile, marine shore stations.  Time to catch up with the
rest of the world.

Many remote base stations, both ham and non-ham, use UHF radio
as the "studio to transmitter link", instead of internet/phone
lines.  So it is not the same as a cell phone call.

A little appreciated benefit of remote base stations is the
ability to listen on your own frequency while transmitting.
This is invaluable in pileups.  I have a remote base 70 miles
away AND a local station.  I can hear myself, but not very loud.
This is the ultimate in break-in operation.

Rick N6RK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Mark Robinson
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 6:43 AM
> To: hermans; 'Scott W3TX'; 'Krishna Kanakasapapathi'; 'Alan NV8A'
> Cc: 'towertalk reflector'; 'Tom Osborne'
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using
> CC&R's
>
>
> To me having the antenna and the station at the same place is all
> part of it
> otherwise I might as well just make a cell phone call. Just my
> take on it -
> too each their own though
>
>
>
> Mark N1UK G3ZZM
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>
> To: "'Scott W3TX'" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>; "'Krishna
> Kanakasapapathi'" <kkanakas@cisco.com>; "'Alan NV8A'" <nv8a@att.net>
> Cc: "'towertalk reflector'" <towertalk@contesting.com>; "'Tom Osborne'"
> <w7why@verizon.net>
> Sent: Monday, 02 July, 2007 9:38 AM
> Subject: [TowerTalk] RE : Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's
>
>
> In other words " outplacement " Hey we heard about that elsewhere.....!
> Technically a very interesting matter, but dont you are affraid to lose
> great deal  of your independence.
> Please leave the shot guns in the cupboards.......!
>
> Jos
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] De la part de Scott W3TX
> Envoyé : lundi 2 juillet 2007 3:28
> À : Krishna Kanakasapapathi; Alan NV8A
> Cc : towertalk reflector; Tom Osborne
> Objet : Re: [TowerTalk] Deed _protection_ for antennas using CC&R's
>
>
> This is why the future of amateur radio will depend, to some degree, upon
> remote stations.
>
> We need to collectively get over the idea that our antennas need to be
> co-located with our home!
>
> 73, Scott W3TX
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>