Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare?

To: <richard@karlquist.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box compare?
From: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 15:50:53 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Agreed but I have worked quite a few stations on 80m who were using the 
Comtek box and they had good directional characteristics from their arrays. 
If you have a nice flat location then the Comtek box should work well but it 
is not so easy to tweak as the DXE box.

Mark N1UK G3ZZM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
To: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, 05 July, 2007 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] How does the DX engineering 4Sq phasing box 
compare?


> IMHO, the DXE is the first box to do it the "right" way.
> It is also fairly expensive.  I don't own any of these,
> but the DXE is similar to stuff I have homebrewed that
> worked well.  It looks like a good implementation.
>
> Rick N6RK
>
> jeremy-ca wrote:
>> Im considering going to a 4sq for 80M and possibly 160 and wonder how the
>> DX
>> Engr compares to Comtek and others?
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>