Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] CCR's -- Am I being too paranoid?

To: "TOWERTALK Reflector" <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>, "Robert Crews" <k1va_k1va@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] CCR's -- Am I being too paranoid?
From: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:16:53 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
This is a topic for the Ham-Law reflector where the lawyers and judges hang
out.  There you can get an idea of what you are dealing with.
_______________________________________________________
The Ham-Law Mailing List. This list is for discussion and does not
purport to give legal advice.
Submissions:  ham-law@mail.altlaw.com
Subscribe and unsubscribe:    listserver@mail.altlaw.com
Use "(un)subscribe ham-law@mail.altlaw.com" on a new line in the text.

73, Jim



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Crews" <k1va_k1va@hotmail.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] CCR's -- Am I being too paranoid?


>
> Last week I made an offer on an 11-acre property outside of Kingman, AZ.
> It was accepted and yesterday the title company sent me a copy of the
property's CCR's to sign off.
> There is no mention ANYWHERE within the CCR's about towers, antennae,
height limitations, or any communications equipment.
> However, one item caught my attention:
>
> "(9) No noxious or offensive trade or activity shall be conducted
> upon any portion of said land, nor shall anything be done thereon
> which may be or become an annoyance to the neighborhood;
> and no refuse piles, junk piles, wrecked car bodes, weeds or
> other unsightly objects shall be permitted to be placed or to
> remain upon said land unless completely hidden from view from
> any neighboring property or access road, and in the event that
> any of such owners shall not comply with the above provisions,
> then declarants, or their successors and assigns, shall have the
> right to enter upon said land and remove the offending
> objects at the expense of such owner, who shall repay the
> same upon demand, and such entry shall not be deemed
> as trespass."
>
> The key word here is unsightly objects. Are towers/antennas
> considered to be unsightly objects?
>
> Some further facts about the area. The county building inspector
> gave me a copy of communications towers rules -- Amateur
> Radio and CB are totally exempt -- no building permit needed. Only
> setback rules need to be followed. One neighboring property has a
> 40-foot windmill tower. Another has a mobile home that has been
> gutted. There is NO homeowners association. The area is very
> rural with 5- to 10-acre parcels the norm.
>
> Am I being too paranoid or is this a red flag?
>
> Bob / K1VA
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live Hotmail is giving away Zunes.
>
http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/ZuneADay/?locale=en-US&ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Mobile_Zune_V3
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>