Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs"

To: "'Richards'" <jruing@ameritech.net>, "'Graham Dacombe'" <zl3nz@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs"
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:54:50 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Not knowing the height but guessing they are not over very high for 160m, an
inverted V at low heights will be fairly omni directional.  

Without more info it is hard to speculate.

 


"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richards
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:31 PM
To: Graham Dacombe
Cc: Towertalk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Two Inverted "Vs"

How high are they?   What are they suspended from?
What other stuff is nearby  (trees, buildings, poles, metal stuff?)
What type of coax are you using?   Length ?  What gauge wire
are the elements?

I think the modeling program can tell us more if we tell it more.



=========  Happy trails.  - Richards - K8JHR  ===========




Graham Dacombe wrote:

> Can anyone predict or better still model what would happen if I link 
> the two "Inverted Vs" together and run one coax down to the transmitter?
> 
> 

==============================================
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>