| To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160? |
| From: | "Jim Brown" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 04 May 2009 14:44:32 -0700 |
| List-post: | <[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]> |
On Mon, 4 May 2009 17:31:05 -0400, [email protected] wrote: > it worked great, even with >a much less than perfect ground system. Yes. And, of course, making the antenna longer increases its radiation resistance, which in turn reduces the losses in the radial system. A good radial system still helps, but it is a few dB less important. 73, Jim Brown K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Rick Karlquist |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Amphenol PL259, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Rick Karlquist |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Al Williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |