Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 135' open wire fed dipole pattern

To: <KI9A@aol.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 135' open wire fed dipole pattern
From: "Forrest Wolf" <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:22:44 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 Cebik has a great writeup.

//cebik.com

Click on Tales and Technicals

Near the bottom of the page, click on Antennas From the Ground Up

#5 is the one you want, A 135' Center-Fed .... Compendium.


Happy reading,

73 de W7SG 

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of KI9A@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 6:54 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] 135' open wire fed dipole pattern

Gang, 
 
I have right now, a 135' long dipole, fed with 450 ohm ladderline.  It  is
in a vee, apex about 50', ends about 10'.  
 
I have a chance to use a neighbors tree, his idea-gotta LOVE that, which
will put it up as a flat top, 60-70'.  Will be broadside NE/SW.
 
I am looking for a decent domestic antenna, the VEE is great, but, as a ham,
I'm always looking for more.  My GAP Voyager is fine for my city lot  on
40/80 DX, works all it can hear.  
 
What does the pattern look like for a V at 50', and a flat top at  60'?
 
73- Chuck KI9A
**************The Average US Credit Score is 692. See Yours in Just 2 Easy
Steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222376999x1201454299/aol?redir=htt
p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=M
ay51009AvgfooterNO62)
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>