Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160 - 80m "T"

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 - 80m "T"
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:16:27 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Sun, 24 May 2009 22:34:09 +0100, Steve Hunt wrote:

>I was shooting for 1.9MHz.

Steve,

One important point. An inductively loaded antenna isn't going to be 
very broadband. Less of a problem if your feedline is fat coax and 
short as a fraction of a wavelength. You didn't say what your 
objective is. Here in NA, virtually all of the CW action is below 
1840 kHz except during contests, and even then, CW rarely extends 
much above 1900 kHz, and only for a few peak hours. 

Another set of thoughts. The smart money says to put your loading as 
close to the top as practical, and try to get as much loading as 
possible from capacitance (those top wires). Think about how you 
might add more than two top wires, even if they must slope, run 
irregularly, or even as a fan. 

As to the fan -- let's say your supports allow a Tee shape top. 
Consider increasing the capacitance of the top by making both sides 
of the top of the Tee parallel wires with spacers, the wider the 
better!  I've not modeled it, but it should work. 

73,

Jim Brown K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>