Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] G5RV original article

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] G5RV original article
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 05:07:06 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:38:42 +0000
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV original article
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Message-ID: <4D4BD732.8000400@karinya.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Bill,

That's torn it! Now folk will be able to see what Varney actually said, 
instead of making up their own versions ;)

Steve G3TXQ

On 03/02/2011 20:44, Bill McDowell wrote:
> Here is G5RV's original article from 1958
>
> http://www.k6mhe.com/n7ws/G5RV.PDF
>
> 73
> Bill,K4CIA

## I stand corrected.  It's touted as a 160-80-40-20-15-10m ant.  IMO..it's 
still a lousy ant
for 75m.  A fan dipole cut for 80-40-20-10m will work better.  And the 40m 
portion will work on 15m.

Jim   VE7RF

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>