Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] book Tribander comparison test

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] book Tribander comparison test
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:16:04 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 > The extra elements give you extra degrees of freedom.  It's like
 > building a filter.  More sections gives you the ability to have a
 > passband that's wider and flatter.

I haven't seen a successful (95% efficient for the total boom length)
OWA design that covers 20/15/10 meters much less 20, 17, 15, 12, 10
and six meters.


73,

    ... Joe, W4TV

On 3/2/2011 8:27 AM, jimlux wrote:
> On 3/2/11 3:25 AM, Jim Thomson wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:22:29 -0800
>> From: jimlux<jimlux@earthlink.net>
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] book Tribander comparison test
>>
>>
>> In a fixed configuration Yagi-Uda, you're looking to simultaneously
>> optimize Z, Gain, and F/B, and that's hard to do over a frequency *range*.
>>
>> ## Not really with 4-5-6 els....esp with the OWA designs.  Then you can
>> have your cake..and eat it too.  Then all that's  required is a good balun.
>>
> Yes..
>
> The extra elements give you extra degrees of freedom.  It's like
> building a filter.  More sections gives you the ability to have a
> passband that's wider and flatter.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>