Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 100, Issue 37

To: "'Tom Cox'" <tomcox@iquest.net>, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 100, Issue 37
From: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:57:05 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
This article will explain the Ufer ground and the causes of concrete
cracking (i.e. poor implementation)

http://www.comm-omni.com/polyweb/ufertower.htm


Doug

>-----Original Message-----
>
>This is an enduring myth, isn't it? What seems to
>get neglected from the discussions is that
>concrete is already a conductor, with or without
>the rebar. One of the points of the Ufer ground
>system is that the whole outer surface of the
>concrete, wherever it touches the ground, is a
>ground electrode, and the surface in contact with
>the ground is measured in square feet, not square
>inches.
>
>As you said, Dave, where's the evidence for
>lightning-induced explosions, or spalling, or any
>of that, in a properly-constructed base? That's
>why it was used to protect hundreds of tons of
>munitions in lightning-prone Arizona Quonset huts
>in WWII. Thanks. Mr. Ufer.
>
>73,
>Tom, KT9OM

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>